Subject:
|
Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Mar 2000 15:45:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
812 times
|
| |
|
|
Farlie A wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Gary R. Istok writes:
>
> > OK as a professed LEGO Archeologist, and sometimes LEGO Anthropologist, LEGO...
> > minifigs first showed up on the planet several decades ago. They were a limbless
> > species (known by their Latin name of Minifigicus Stifficanus) that first evolved
> > circa 1973. They were a faceless, limbless species that didn't survive long
> > because of their handicaps.
>
> > In 1977 a new species evolved called Minifigicus
> > Erectus, which developed arms, legs and faces. This species is very prolific, > and is still with us today.
>
> There is also evidence in the Brickshelf Archives that the two species were
> for a short time co-inhabitants. Why Stiffcanus died out is unkown to me.
>
> More reasearch is needed on the follwing types :
>
> Minfigicus (Animus?) - A cross breed with variou animal types first seen in
> Fabuland. Animal shaped but exhbiting
> humaniod inteligence and values.
> ? - A large type seen mainly In technic
> ? - A closly raleted type to the above,
> rumoured to be more femmine in nature and
> has a higher female population than male.
>
> A very recent additon is the Minfigus Scalaus - This appears to be a very
> new breed being more related to Mattelus Maddona Erectus than to previous
> Lego species.
>
> Apologies if my clasiifications are wrong and i would welcome a more trained
> mind to point out my errors.
>
> Alex
>
> >
> > Gary Istok
> > LEGO Professor Emeritus
Lest we forget that recent dreaded mutant subspecies: Minifigicus Timmycanus!
Gary Istok
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
