To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 16184
16183  |  16185
Subject: 
Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Thu, 9 Mar 2000 08:27:30 GMT
Viewed: 
714 times
  
In lugnet.general, Alan Gerber writes:
In lugnet.general, Gary R. Istok writes:
circa 1973.  They were a faceless, limbless species that didn't survive long
because of their handicaps.  In 1977 a new species evolved called Minifigicus
Erectus, which developed arms, legs and faces.  This species is very • prolific,
and
is still with us today.
What about the figs from this set(is Gary wrong?): <set:1620> .  Lugnet says
1978, but Brickset says 1976, which would make it the first set with minifigs.
Alan
Random set: 5987(not yet on lugnet, since number is from retailer catalog)

The minifig as we know it today was introduced in 1978. I have browsed my
catalog collection and found only limbless minifigs in 1977 and older catalogs.

Also see the text on the top of page 13 of the 1978 catalog:
http://www.brickshelf.com/scans/catalogs/1978/c78us/c78us-13.html
'Some sets include the new action packed Mini-Figures. They have arms and legs
that move, plus sturdy hands for carrying, lifting and climbing'

Also the dutch catalog:
http://www.brickshelf.com/scans/catalogs/1978/c78nl/c78nl-09.html
'The new, small and funny LEGO figures (LEGOLANDERTJES) can move their arms
and legs and their hands can carry things. Also they have faces and hats,
helmets or hairpieces'

<plug>For more figures and the time they appeared in, see the LEXICON
'F,Figures'[1] at http://members.chello.nl/~f.buiting/lego/f.html</plug>

-Frank

[1] I'll alter the 1979 to 1978 this weekend, must be a typo because it was
correct in the notes I used for this page...



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO)
 
(...) catalogs. (...) This set was a promo set, so it wouldn't be in any catalogs. And Gary's 1977 set is an American only set. Alan Random set: <set:107> (...) (24 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO)
 
(...) and (...) What about the figs from this set(is Gary wrong?): <set:1620> . Lugnet says 1978, but Brickset says 1976, which would make it the first set with minifigs. Alan Random set: 5987(not yet on lugnet, since number is from retailer (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)

49 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR