Subject:
|
Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Mar 2000 21:45:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
716 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Will Hess writes:
> > OK as a professed LEGO Archeologist, and sometimes LEGO Anthropologist, • LEGO...
> > minifigs first showed up on the planet several decades ago. They were a • limbless
> > species (known by their Latin name of Minifigicus Stifficanus) that first • evolved
> > circa 1973. They were a faceless, limbless species that didn't survive long
> > because of their handicaps. In 1977 a new species evolved called • Minifigicus
> > Erectus, which developed arms, legs and faces. This species is very • prolific,
> and
> > is still with us today.
>
> There is evidence that Minifigicus Erectus is a subspecies of Maxifigius
> Omnipedus (sets 268, 5233, etc.) It appears that the two coexisted for a • short
> time before MO died out. Some think that Technicfigius Erectus may have • evolved
> from MO, but there is no direct evidence to support such a theory.
>
> Will (tongue FIRMLY in cheek :-)
>
> Lego Beach Department of Emergency Services
> http://www.crosswinds.net/~hokie
This would imply that Technicfigius is another genus rather than just a
different species. I think that a species classification is sufficient:
Minifigicus Robustus Erectus (if one can say that in polite company). :-)
Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
