Subject:
|
Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Mar 2000 12:31:27 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
SGORE@SUPERONLINEnospam.COM
|
Viewed:
|
696 times
|
| |
|
|
Will Hess wrote:
>
> > OK as a professed LEGO Archeologist, and sometimes LEGO Anthropologist, • LEGO...
> > minifigs first showed up on the planet several decades ago. They were a • limbless
> > species (known by their Latin name of Minifigicus Stifficanus) that first • evolved
> > circa 1973. They were a faceless, limbless species that didn't survive long
> > because of their handicaps. In 1977 a new species evolved called Minifigicus
> > Erectus, which developed arms, legs and faces. This species is very prolific, • and
> > is still with us today.
>
> There is evidence that Minifigicus Erectus is a subspecies of Maxifigius
> Omnipedus (sets 268, 5233, etc.) It appears that the two coexisted for a short
> time before MO died out. Some think that Technicfigius Erectus may have evolved
> from MO, but there is no direct evidence to support such a theory.
Actually MO is a very strange evolution path. There is no relation
between MO and Technifigius as you already stated. Actually, MO evolved
into canadian arms/crane arms and the like..:-)
Selçuk
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
