Subject:
|
Re: LDGlite and LPub
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:25:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1670 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Don Heyse wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > I was able to make -mS work, but only if I backed way off on the 60000
> > number.
>
> Yeah, that 60000 number plays havoc with a bunch of things. You get a
> lot of z-bleeding because the clipping planes are spread so far apart.
> Maybe I get less depth bits on the offscreen buffer. Gotta check. And
> I suppose I should borrow the l3p bounding box/sphere? algorithm from
> the ldview sources and use that to set the clipping planes. Of course
> I've sorta been waiting for the new l3p before trying most of this stuff
> because then you can use a real ortho view and skip tiny viewing angle
> and teloscopic view stuff. Oh well.
>
> > By the time LPub presents the car model to ldglite to render, LPub has
> > already applied ROTSTEP to the model, assuming the default 30,45 long/lat,
> > This is why LPub uses 0,0, instead of 30,45.
> >
> > Thanks for looking into this.
>
> Sure. So did you want me to fix the -mS and aspect ratio calculation,
> or do you have a viable workaround?
I can live with -ms, but would prefer to have -mS working also. I'm not sure if
the rapid popping up and down of the window will cause palpatations.
>
> Don
Thanks again,
Kevin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LDGlite and LPub
|
| (...) Yeah, that 60000 number plays havoc with a bunch of things. You get a lot of z-bleeding because the clipping planes are spread so far apart. Maybe I get less depth bits on the offscreen buffer. Gotta check. And I suppose I should borrow the (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
