To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 11998
11997  |  11999
Subject: 
Re: LDGlite and LPub (and maybe ldview?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Sat, 16 Oct 2004 09:35:30 GMT
Viewed: 
1377 times
  
Not that my opinion goes for everyone but I think a solid color looks better.  A
transparent render show all the back edge making the image appear jumbled.  To
be honest I don't see how using grey, yellow, red or any other solid color is
confusing since there's a color chart for the part immediately below the preview
pic.

-Orion

Let's have a vote! I'm with Orion btw :)



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: LDGlite and LPub (and maybe ldview?
 
(...) It's not really a votable issue since it's ultimately Peeron admin's decision. I don't want to twist the Boger's arms on something trival like this. -Orion (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad)
  Re: LDGlite and LPub (and maybe ldview?
 
(...) I have to say I think a trans colour is better as it allows you to see the interior detail of the part, some of the default orientations for parts don't allow you differentiate between similar parts when in a solid colour. Tim (20 years ago, 18-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LDGlite and LPub (and maybe ldview?
 
(...) Not that my opinion goes for everyone but I think a solid color looks better. A transparent render show all the back edge making the image appear jumbled. To be honest I don't see how using grey, yellow, red or any other solid color is (...) (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad)

52 Messages in This Thread:













Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR