Subject:
|
Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Feb 1999 04:51:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1455 times
|
| |
|
|
At 12:42 AM 2/11/99 +0000, Terry wrote:
> I agree with that. I would have no objections to linking to custom sites for
> non-lego parts. The more the merrier.
> I just think that LDraw should remain just that. Not MBDraw or TDraw. :-)
Um, I wouldn't object either, as long as it is off-site and clearly marked
as unofficial clone parts. We don't need to see "Keep Ldraw Pure" buttons
popping up on people's sites.. ;)
Keep Building!!
-Tim <><
http://www.zacktron.com
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
New Lugnet Newsgroup? lugnet.off-topic.timmy.die.die.die ??
LEGO: SP++++c(6973)[ip++++ bt2++++ ex+++ ft+++ sp+++ ut++]
AQ+++(6175)[an+++ as++ hn-- sr--] TO++[ob+ dv+ tc-- tt-- tjr.---] TC++ CA+
PI+ BV--- DU--- HM--- S+ LS>+++ #++++ Hal M+ A+ YB82m
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) LOL :) Though I would support one of those (if necessary) and plaster the 'pure' image on my site if the condition of the clone parts sunk to that level.. *sigh* -- bad week.. [1] [2] [1] Not at all related to this list, but was a general sigh (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) You're a brave man. ;) (...) I think you've gotten a taste of how the community feels. This has come up before, with some half-height plates (I think these were Tyco parts, maybe MegaBloks did them, too). They were not allowed into a parts (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
