Subject:
|
Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:39:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2125 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999 16:36:29 GMT, Sproaticus <jsproat@geocities.com> wrote:
> John VanZwieten wrote:
> > For posting such a model to lugnet.cad.dat you could just inline the
> > unofficial parts (at least until the .mpd format is supported by LDLite, at
> > which point you post in .mpd format and include the part files). A comment
> > explaining the homemade part(s) would be appreciated, though--I'd hate to get
> > all excited about building a cool model and then find out I had to hurt my
> > Lego to finish it.
>
> You know, I thought of this after I posted. A while ago, someone posted a
> Mindstorms "Rocker Boogie Rambler". (1)(2) It used MOC LDraw pieces to
> represent rubber bands, and those parts were inlined into the model. I
> wouldn't have any moral problems viewing a model with non-TLG pieces if they
> were inlined; the only technical concern I can think of is the potential
> size of the message.
I think that was Linc (?)
But he did that to represent TLG rubber bands, much the same as others have
done to represent hoses. So that wasn't a case of "non-TLG" pieces.
As far as message size goes, yes it does inflate things a bit, as do custom
hoses. In the case of hoses, that is something we will have to live with, as
each hose adds about 100 lines of code to a file.
How much a custom rubber-band will add to the file I don't know.
Just my .02 on that. :-)
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) You know, I thought of this after I posted. A while ago, someone posted a Mindstorms "Rocker Boogie Rambler". (1)(2) It used MOC LDraw pieces to represent rubber bands, and those parts were inlined into the model. I wouldn't have any moral (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
