Subject:
|
Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Feb 1999 03:58:55 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@geocitiesAVOIDSPAM.com
|
Viewed:
|
1512 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> Call me a brand-purist, I guess. Maybe it comes from playing with LEGO for
> over 30 years and always enjoying it. (And playing with off-brands every
> once in a while and very seldom enjoying it.)
I'll admit, I'm something of a Lego fanatic myself. However, I have had
some very good experiences building with Tente and Construx. I wish now
that I had never gotten rid of my Tente pieces. :-(
> It wouldn't bother me if people talked about modelling non-LEGO-brand
> entities so long as it furthered the cause of the phenomenon known as LDraw
> and didn't get in the way of real LEGO discussions, but I'd be very pleased
> never to see the .cad.dat group cluttered up with clone stuff.
Hmmm... I would suggest that a lugnet.cad.dat.clone group be created for
just this thing, except that in reality it would probably never be used due
to lack of parts. :-, I guess it's bridge to cross when / if we get there.
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
_
| | I'm sorry Dave, but Abort, Retry or Fail?
|o| Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
|_| http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) It's both. Not that I'm closed-minded, but I really have a lot of trouble imagining a competitor ever coming out with a better product in the same category as LEGO. And even if one did -- and even if the product were totally LEGO compatible -- (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
