To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 55
54  |  56
Subject: 
Re: Non-TLG Parts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Wed, 10 Feb 1999 07:02:20 GMT
Viewed: 
1108 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, jsproat@geocities.com (Sproaticus) writes:
Roy Earls writes:
First, I have wondered how the community feels about the creation of
non-standard parts.  By this I mean parts that TLG has not created ( at
least not to my knowledge ).

I think it would be great -- I don't know of any existing restrictions other
than the possibility that no one has published their efforts in this regard.

I would be more receptive to other brand-name parts than to mangled pieces,
however -- e.g. Tyco and Mega-Bloks, etc.

Is there a way (or rules) to prevent non-TLG parts from creeping into the
official LDraw updates?  That seems like the only practical/logical
danger...any other objections (like mine) would be personal/subjective.

I don't use LDraw/LEdit enough for my opinion to really count here, but I
know that it would really bother me* to see .DAT files referencing non-TLG
parts posted to the lugnet.cat.dat newsgroup.  People can still do what they
want of course, since the charter for lugnet.cad.dat places no restrictions
on the content of the .DAT files posted to it, but I would hope that people
still have enough respect for LEGO to keep non-TLG parts well-separated,
somehow.

--Todd

* I wish that all imitation brands would drop off the face of the earth**,
and I believe that imitation brands such as MegaBloks are just as much
responsible for the decline of LEGO quality as well as price in recent
years.

** I won't even let MegaBloks go into my spelling dictionary.  :-)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Non-TLG Parts
 
(...) Oh, sure. All parts that go into the updates go through a peer review process, then the collection is assembled by Terry for distribution. Even assuming the non-Lego parts survive the voting, all that would be needed is policy on Terry's end (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Non-TLG Parts
 
(...) I think it would be great -- I don't know of any existing restrictions other than the possibility that no one has published their efforts in this regard. I would be more receptive to other brand-name parts than to mangled pieces, however -- (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

37 Messages in This Thread:




















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR