Subject:
|
Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Feb 1999 04:42:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1153 times
|
| |
|
|
At 04:14 AM 2/10/99 +0000, Roy Earls wrote:
> I'm not sure how the best way to broach this subject, but to jump head first
> best.
You did a good job of it, though I don't think you'll like the replies from
people (personal prediction).
> What I wonder is --- How does everyone feel about this?
I would personally severely disapprove. Though it could be argued to
include clone bricks (which your described part would fall under nicely -
it exists), I would take a position against it. Ldraw was as far as I
understand it was intended by James for Lego models. I know that I would
argue against placing a non-TLG part in an official L-CAD update (or what
do we call ourselves now?). I guess there is no stopping you from creating
it, but I personally would not use it.
Ldraw Consortium for the group name?
Keep Building!!
-Tim <><
http://www.zacktron.com
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
New Lugnet Newsgroup? lugnet.off-topic.timmy.die.die.die ??
LEGO: SP++++c(6973)[ip++++ bt2++++ ex+++ ft+++ sp+++ ut++]
AQ+++(6175)[an+++ as++ hn-- sr--] TO++[ob+ dv+ tc-- tt-- tjr.---] TC++ CA+
PI+ BV--- DU--- HM--- S+ LS>+++ #++++ Hal M+ A+ YB82m
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) :) Um, I didn't know there was a thing out there for MOC bricks.. interesting... (...) Yep, I don't mean any offense either, and I agree with you Todd. (...) Another good idea.. group, lets keep the creative juices flowing.. Ldraw Consortium? (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) So would I (personally). (...) Me too. In fact, I would take a stronger position against clone bricks than against purely-MOC bricks. This isn't to suggest that every official TLG element is a fragrant flower, but IMHO all clone elements are (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Non-TLG Parts
|
| I'm not sure how the best way to broach this subject, but to jump head first best. First, I have wondered how the community feels about the creation of non-standard parts. By this I mean parts that TLG has not created ( at least not to my knowledge (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
