Subject:
|
Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Feb 1999 22:17:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1633 times
|
| |
|
|
At 03:19 PM 2/11/99 +0000, you wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 1999 04:51:07 GMT, Tim Courtney <tcourtney@avenew.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Um, I wouldn't object either, as long as it is off-site and clearly marked
> > as unofficial clone parts. We don't need to see "Keep Ldraw Pure" buttons
> > popping up on people's sites.. ;)
>
> Hmmm. "LDraw Purists Homepage", anyone?
LOL :)
Though I would support one of those (if necessary) and plaster the 'pure'
image on my site if the condition of the clone parts sunk to that level..
*sigh* -- bad week.. [1] [2]
[1] Not at all related to this list, but was a general sigh from life.
[2] What's the purpose of an endnote that's right below what needs to be
further explained? :)
Keep Building!!
-Tim <><
http://www.zacktron.com
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
New Lugnet Newsgroup? lugnet.off-topic.timmy.die.die.die ??
LEGO: SP++++c(6973)[ip++++ bt2++++ ex+++ ft+++ sp+++ ut++]
AQ+++(6175)[an+++ as++ hn-- sr--] TO++[ob+ dv+ tc-- tt-- tjr.---] TC++ CA+
PI+ BV--- DU--- HM--- S+ LS>+++ #++++ Hal M+ A+ YB82m
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) I'm not sure the appropriate quality-level of MegaBloks could be modeled in LDraw. They'd fit together just as well as LEGO-based LDraw parts. :( Steve (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) Um, I wouldn't object either, as long as it is off-site and clearly marked as unofficial clone parts. We don't need to see "Keep Ldraw Pure" buttons popping up on people's sites.. ;) Keep Building!! -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 New (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
