Subject:
|
Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Feb 1999 13:51:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1709 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 12 Feb 1999 04:27:53 GMT, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman)
wrote:
> lugnet.cad.dat doesn't specifically say that the .DAT files have to be for
> true LEGO-brand elements and/or models, but I think there are other places
> on the net more appropriate to post or publish non-LEGO-brand-based
> creations.
>
> Just my opinion. (Probably also the 90% majority opinion, however, from the
> sound of things, so the charter for lugnet.cad.dat could or possibly should
> be updated, since it's probably an unspoken expectation that the group only
> be used for data based on real LEGO products and not on clone products.)
I thought the expectation (and specification) was that the newsserver
lugnet.com was to be used for LEGO-oriented discussion and
communication. The *.off-topic hierarchy is just there because we
occasionally get off-track.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) Yeah... I was just being conservative/literal in my interpretation of the charter for the .cad.dat group. I think it really should be modified to say that it's for .DAT files based on LEGO-brand elements only. (Would this cause great unrest? I (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) It's both. Not that I'm closed-minded, but I really have a lot of trouble imagining a competitor ever coming out with a better product in the same category as LEGO. And even if one did -- and even if the product were totally LEGO compatible -- (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
