To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 117
116  |  118
Subject: 
Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Fri, 12 Feb 1999 13:48:06 GMT
Viewed: 
1665 times
  
On Fri, 12 Feb 1999 03:44:39 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
<john_vanzwieten@msn.com> wrote:

Steve Bliss writes:
- Helps people track down part number changes, especially if another
part is now using the old number.

Is this done?

It's happened on at least one occasion.  The problem is with the LDraw
library, usually--a part was released with the wrong number, and there
is a different part which actually should have that number.

I guess I thought that once a number is used, it's used up.

AFAIK, TLG doesn't recycle numbers.

How
does LDAO part update function deal with this?

Badly.  It can't deal with it, because it depends on the "~Moved to
XXXX" titles in the stub-files which replace the old part-file.  When a
new part moves in, there's no indication that a different part used to
live at that address.

(By the way, yet another
awesome addition to LDAO's usefulness.

Thanks.  It would be much more useful if it would recurse through a
model's sub-model files.  Near-future work-around: use an MPD-builder to
combine all the sub-files into a single MPD, then use the Mover (that
thing needs a different name) to process the MPD.

I've just been using it a bunch to fix
models I did last summer.  It's amazing how many "moved to"s there have been
since then.)

Terry and crew have been busy... :)

- Reduces need to overload the Author tag to give proper credit on
modifications.

Good point.  I think this is a good idea then.

Cool.  Now we just need to hear from the most important opinion-holder:
Terrell Keller.  Hey, Terry!  Can we tear you away from those throwbot
parts for a minute?  Stop dreaming, and let us know what you think.

Steve



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
 
(...) Joshua relayed once to me some deductive evidence that TLG has recycled part numbers in at least a couple odd circumstances. For example, the 1x2 plate hinges numbered 4275 & 4276 originally had only 1 hinge finger on the male part and 2 hinge (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
 
(...) A couple of occasions. Not much can be done about it. It requires that any person who had used that part in a model to go back and manually update it to the correct number. (...) As far as the 3-digit (or less) numbers in LDraw goes, I try to (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
 
(...) Is this done? I guess I thought that once a number is used, it's used up. How does LDAO part update function deal with this? (By the way, yet another awesome addition to LDAO's usefulness. I've just been using it a bunch to fix models I did (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

26 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR