Subject:
|
Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Feb 1999 18:25:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
987 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999 01:16:53 GMT, "Steve Bliss"
<blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
Sorry to follow-up on my own message, but would this format be
acceptable to everyone:
0 1999-01-01 SEB Minor corrections
I think that date format will be comprehensible to everyone (does any
country use year-day-month as a standard format?).
SEB are the initials of the person doing the maintenance.
That leaves 63 characters for a one-line comment.
STeve
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
| (...) Yes. I presume it is supposed to be the ISO format (yyyy-mm-dd). (...) Not that I know of. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- LDraw FAQ: <URL:(URL) (25 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
| (...) Yes Japan does, However since it is always confusing when numbered dates are used I would suggest 1999-jan-01 which is unmistakable. (25 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Parts Maintenance Idea
|
| I'm not sure this idea has merit, it might be viewed as unnecessary or overkill. It'd definitely be one more detail to deal with in parts updates. Should we start adding maintenance comments when parts are renumbered, renamed or corrected? These (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
