Subject:
|
Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Feb 1999 15:54:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1434 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 15 Feb 1999 08:59:39 GMT, sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk (Jacob Sparre
Andersen) wrote:
> Steve Bliss (blisses@worldnet.att.net) wrote:
>
> > Sorry to follow-up on my own message, but would this format be
> > acceptable to everyone:
> >
> > 0 1999-01-01 SEB Minor corrections
> >
> > I think that date format will be comprehensible to everyone
>
> Yes. I presume it is supposed to be the ISO format (yyyy-mm-dd).
Yes, it is supposed to by yyyy-mm-dd. No, it isn't supposed to be
an/the ISO format. I'm glad it is, though.
> > (does any country use year-day-month as a standard format?).
>
> Not that I know of.
Good -- then no one will be confused.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
| (...) Yes. I presume it is supposed to be the ISO format (yyyy-mm-dd). (...) Not that I know of. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- LDraw FAQ: <URL:(URL) (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
