Subject:
|
Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Feb 1999 16:00:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
968 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 15 Feb 1999 02:03:36 GMT, "Earls HouseHold"
<brandone@mounet.com> wrote:
> Hmmm. Ask and ye shall recieve. How did you implement the design. I've
> looked at it and have not decided how to handle the area between the loop
> and the plate. Do you remove the connecting material or leave it.
> Remember, this part is a broken regular element. How do the parts usually
> end up? With half the material on each half or with most on one part or the
> other? I can't imagine that it would break cleanly. I have never had one
> of my own ( reclaimed from my children who no longer live we me, well, my
> son does but I never see him except for the lump in his bed ) break, so, I
> assume that they are of the new version.
You could generate a random height-grid, to represent the broken side of
the neo-part. Use that information as a mesh, and convert it to LDraw
code.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <36c84429.9637535@lu...et.com>... (...) Since it would be a random function, wouldn't you need to generate the mesh each time the element is used? Seems like a lot of work for one part, but how would you interface with (...) (25 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| Scott wrote in message <36C7347F.65378519@a...te.net>... (...) Hmmm. Ask and ye shall recieve. How did you implement the design. I've looked at it and have not decided how to handle the area between the loop and the plate. Do you remove the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
