To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 185
184  |  186
Subject: 
Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Wed, 17 Feb 1999 16:42:35 GMT
Viewed: 
1064 times
  
I think that date format will be comprehensible to everyone (does any
country use year-day-month as a standard format?).

Yes Japan does, However since it is always confusing when numbered dates are
used I would suggest 1999-jan-01 which is unmistakable.



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
 
(...) Since Japan uses y-d-m, then the TLA month would be better. Steve (25 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
 
Benoit: (...) I have always believed that Japan uses a year-month-day date format. Are you sure? Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- LDraw FAQ: <URL:(URL) (25 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
 
Sorry cancel that I didn't read it carefully enough Japan uses Year Month Day Benoit a écrit dans le message ... (...) are (...) (25 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
 
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999 01:16:53 GMT, "Steve Bliss" <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote: Sorry to follow-up on my own message, but would this format be acceptable to everyone: 0 1999-01-01 SEB Minor corrections I think that date format will be (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

26 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR