Subject:
|
Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Feb 1999 08:59:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1284 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss (blisses@worldnet.att.net) wrote:
> Sorry to follow-up on my own message, but would this format be
> acceptable to everyone:
>
> 0 1999-01-01 SEB Minor corrections
>
> I think that date format will be comprehensible to everyone
Yes. I presume it is supposed to be the ISO format (yyyy-mm-dd).
> (does any country use year-day-month as a standard format?).
Not that I know of.
Play well,
Jacob
--------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://hugin.risoe.dk/> --
--------------------------------------------
LDraw FAQ: <URL:http://hugin.risoe.dk/JJ_Memorial/FAQ/>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
| (...) Yes, it is supposed to by yyyy-mm-dd. No, it isn't supposed to be an/the ISO format. I'm glad it is, though. (...) Good -- then no one will be confused. Steve (25 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
| On Wed, 10 Feb 1999 01:16:53 GMT, "Steve Bliss" <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote: Sorry to follow-up on my own message, but would this format be acceptable to everyone: 0 1999-01-01 SEB Minor corrections I think that date format will be (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
