Subject:
|
Re: Subgroup for Revamp?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Feb 1999 05:29:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1276 times
|
| |
|
|
At 04:08 AM 2/10/99 +0000, Todd wrote:
> > lugnet.cad.dev.site?
>
> I like the idea of a short-term newsgrouping experiment, but since the
> discussions would be centered around a permanently evolving resource, maybe
> the experiment would work better with a transient resource, project, or
> event instead.
>
> In other words, what can lugnet.com do (and what sorts of discussion
> resources can it provide) to help ldraw.org in the long-term as well as the
> short-term?
Short term, set up a group for discussion.
Long term -- integrate the sites together in crucial areas, like the setup
of tlg models newsgroups and then automatically generating dat files that
correspond with the posts.. similar to online networks of sites like
C|Net? I don't know, but a close integration would be beneficial.
Keep Building!!
-Tim <><
http://www.zacktron.com
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
New Lugnet Newsgroup? lugnet.off-topic.timmy.die.die.die ??
LEGO: SP++++c(6973)[ip++++ bt2++++ ex+++ ft+++ sp+++ ut++]
AQ+++(6175)[an+++ as++ hn-- sr--] TO++[ob+ dv+ tc-- tt-- tjr.---] TC++ CA+
PI+ BV--- DU--- HM--- S+ LS>+++ #++++ Hal M+ A+ YB82m
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Subgroup for Revamp?
|
| (...) Probably good, so we can weed out general ldraw discussion from site discussion. I see the Re: proposal.. thread has been chopped up into the set/piece discussion too..that would help on that as well. lugnet.cad.dev.site? Keep Building!! -Tim (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
