Subject:
|
Re: Are fixes automatically included?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 6 Sep 2000 16:51:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1812 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> [about 2447.dat] One thing I just noticed upon extremely close inspection,
> though.
>
> The four 1-4rin10 pieces that make up the angled bottom are at two SLIGHTLY
> different angles, and furthermore one or both of them doesn't QUITE line up
> with the bottom of the visor. (The two making the outter half-ring appear
> to be just above the inner half-ring at the front of the visor; they meet at
> the back. Since they don't line up with each other, they obviously can't
> both line up with the rest of the visor, but I can't tell if one pair does
> or not.) It's definitely not worth pulling out of the update for, but I
> thought you might want to know.
Oops. My bad. The bottom of the visor is a slanted half-ring, with a
15inner/17outer radius. I constructed this by overlapping the 1-4rin10
p-files, and skewing the Y value to slant the rings downward toward the
front. But I used the same skew-factor for both the inner and outer rings,
even though they have different radii and needed heights.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Are fixes automatically included?
|
| "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:gi1arsoj23ml4du...4ax.com... (...) new (...) using (...) renderings (...) better (...) This is true. I just finished getting LDView's primitive substitution working for the quarter sloped (...) (26 years ago, 6-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
73 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
