Subject:
|
Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 13:25:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1929 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Manfred Moolhuysen wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes:
> [snip]
> > I feel just the opposite. "Decorated" is a common description for parts
> > with printed patterns on them. I've never heard anyone refer to these
> > parts as "Ornamented".
> >
> > "Decorative" is better than "Decorated" (i.e., less likely to be
> > confusing). But (as you said) "Decorative" implies the part has no use,
> > other than an ornamental one.
> >
> > For me, "Ornamented" implies a part that is useful, but has extra doodads
> > on it. Like the Slizer leg (see <http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dat/?n=154>).
> > This piece is very useful, but it has some non-functional, ornamental bits
> > on it.[1]
>
> O.K. Ornamented it will be then.
Alrighty. And truly decorative parts can still be labeled as decorative.
But I'm not retro-labeling *anything*.
So, should 32166.dat, Technic Connector Block 3 x 6 x 1 & 2/3 Gearbox,
be renamed to Technic Gearbox 3 x 6 x 1 & 2/3 Gearbox Ornamented?
> By the way, Steve, Did you already notice that I've started to send "suggested
> update revisions" to your adress "partsref@worldnet.att.net" ?
Yep. I replied (by email) this morning.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
| In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes: [snip] (...) O.K. Ornamented it will be then. By the way, Steve, Did you already notice that I've started to send "suggested update revisions" to your adress "partsref@worldnet.att.net" ? (26 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
73 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
