Subject:
|
Re: 30223 contains co-planar polygons
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 3 Sep 2000 03:58:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1026 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs writes:
> > Part 30223 contains co-planar polygons. View it in L3Lab with random colors
> > turned on to graphically see what I'm talking about. Is this considered ok,
> > or should this qualify as "Needs work"?
>
> Lars Hassing pointed that out to me this morning, and I plan to fix it. In
> the meantime, I would say a "needs work" tag would not be out of order.
While the setup of this part is not the best style, there are many parts
already in the library with similar designs. It's kind of a middling quality
thing.
I'd like to see this fixed, but I don't think this deserves a "needs work" tag.
Also, there are some instances where overlaying polygons is justified, at
least from the POV of the amount of work required to custom-fit the polygons.
Steve
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: 30223 contains co-planar polygons
|
| (...) tag. Happily, the "bad vertex sequences" were easier to fix than I anticipated, and the part now seems to pass the L3P check-test. I'll resend it to you, if you'd like. Other than the correction, the part is more-or-less identical to the one (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: 30223 contains co-planar polygons
|
| "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:G0ALp7.7D9@lugnet.com... (...) tag. (...) polygons. That sounds good to me, at least in this case. Since the overlapping polygons are the same color, they shouldn't cause any rendering (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
73 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
