Subject:
|
Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 22:07:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1039 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes:
[snip]
> I feel just the opposite. "Decorated" is a common description for parts
> with printed patterns on them. I've never heard anyone refer to these
> parts as "Ornamented".
>
> "Decorative" is better than "Decorated" (i.e., less likely to be
> confusing). But (as you said) "Decorative" implies the part has no use,
> other than an ornamental one.
>
> For me, "Ornamented" implies a part that is useful, but has extra doodads
> on it. Like the Slizer leg (see <http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dat/?n=154>).
> This piece is very useful, but it has some non-functional, ornamental bits
> on it.[1]
O.K. Ornamented it will be then.
By the way, Steve, Did you already notice that I've started to send "suggested
update revisions" to your adress "partsref@worldnet.att.net" ?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
| (...) Alrighty. And truly decorative parts can still be labeled as decorative. But I'm not retro-labeling *anything*. So, should 32166.dat, Technic Connector Block 3 x 6 x 1 & 2/3 Gearbox, be renamed to Technic Gearbox 3 x 6 x 1 & 2/3 Gearbox (...) (24 years ago, 23-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
| (...) Oh, right. Good point. (...) Right. The parts in question *are* useful, and do have some mirrors and beads on them (so to speak). (...) I feel just the opposite. "Decorated" is a common description for parts with printed patterns on them. I've (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
73 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
