Subject:
|
Re: Some Words To BFC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:26:56 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
2036 times
|
| |
|
|
Michael Lachmann wrote:
>
> My suggestion is to keep the BFC statements as simple as possible. Meaning we
> should rather correct wrong defined
> parts than letting the software correct wrong definitions!!!!
That's why I droped out of the BFC discussion a long time ago, we are
making this a big issue with proposals for a new extension when we could
make things much simpler.
If you know that a part is wrong, instead of adding a "0 INVERSE"
statement (or whatever you call it now) you just change the orientation,
I guess that Steve should be able to add a command that inverts the
sequence of points of a quad/tri to LDAO easily (if he has enough free
time). This way a program will only have to check for inverse matrixes
on files that are outside the ldraw/parts directory.
Leonardo
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| Leonardo Zide <leonardo@centroin.com.br> wrote in message news:38E9EDA0.2C97D9....com.br... (...) Meaning we (...) It's not just a matter of knowing that a part is "wrong" and fixing it. The problem is primitives where either the inner faces or the (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| (...) I also have taken a rest somewhere in discussion, due to lack of time. the simpler the better. (...) Well it seems that you (Leonardo, maybe someone else) didn't understand the difference between an invert matrix and the goal of the current "0 (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| (...) That's not always possible, as has been discussed. And is still being discussed... (...) Yeah, that's a possibility. (...) OK, but that's a complication for the rendering engine. It would have to check the actual path of each file, after the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Some Words To BFC
|
| Hy, I finaly got internet-access here, and could follow the discussions about BFC. Some words I would like to say first: I think it doesn't make sence to blame Steve about BFC stuff, since I asked him if the spec is in a state that we could try it. (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
