Subject:
|
Re: Some Words To BFC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Apr 2000 13:52:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2587 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> writes:
> A second question: *should* parts be required to be BFC-compliant?
I don't think they should. Parts authors are (probably) motivated by
their interest for the LDraw format, so I would expect a few to handle
the BFC-compliance of their parts. But to demand that everybody do
this would probably exclude far to many from developing and submitting
parts.
Fredrik
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| (...) A second question: *should* parts be required to be BFC-compliant? There is a certain amount of extra work required to make parts work for BFC. Without a mostly-automated cleanup tool, does it make sense to put this burden on part authors? (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
