Subject:
|
Re: Some Words To BFC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Apr 2000 12:52:46 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
RUI.MARTINS@avoidspamLINK.PT
|
Viewed:
|
2406 times
|
| |
|
|
> > A second question: *should* parts be required to be BFC-compliant?
> > There is a certain amount of extra work required to make parts work for
> > BFC. Without a mostly-automated cleanup tool, does it make sense to put
> > this burden on part authors?
>
>
> IMHO, no. If a mostly automated cleanup tool can be devised, then a few of
> us could clean up new parts after they are voted in and before they are
> released. Part authors could be made aware of how to create compliant parts,
> but making it a requirement would hamper new part development too much.
Completly agree, but part authors should strive to (if possible) present the
parts for voiting already BFC compliant. But it's NOT a requirement.
This reasoning also favours the "non branch BFC dependence", even authors which
don't supply BFC compliant parts would benefit from the BFC compliant
primitives.
> With over 1,800 files to worry about currently, unless each part can be
> corrected with just a couple minutes of work or less, I don't see how it
> would be possible to convert the entire database.
It can be done with some time, with no rush.
> In that case, I think we
> should just concentrate on those parts that give the biggest bang for the
> buck (standard bricks, plates, etc) and we have to stick with Steve's
> proposal for determining when to allow BFC'ing.
Before "we have to to stick with Steve's proposal" I would like my recent BFC
related e-mails to be replyed, and I would also like someone to convince me
why my proposed approach is worst or why someone elses is better, thank you.
See ya
Rui Martins
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:7cjkescmg077t76...4ax.com... (...) into (...) IMHO, no. If a mostly automated cleanup tool can be devised, then a few of us could clean up new parts after they are voted in and before (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
