Subject:
|
Re: dragNdrop (Was: Ldglite must be faster)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 7 Sep 2002 17:09:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1171 times
|
| |
|
|
Don Heyse wrote:
> This gets me thinking, I wonder what they're using for dragNdrop
> on linux these days,
It appears to be a mess of desktop system specific protocols
(KDE and Gnome) in addition to the standard X11 "clip board"
(see section L.2, "Peer-to-Peer Communications via
Selections", pp. 370 in "X Protocol Reference Manual") which
is The Right Way(tm) to do it.
Play well,
Jacob
--
Brakzand II:
http://jacob.sparre.dk/LEGO/Transport/Skibe/Brakzand_II/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: dragNdrop (Was: Ldglite must be faster)
|
| (...) I guess I'll have to do some tests in KDE and GNOME to see it the X selection buffer still works. It'd be nice to be able to drag in an inventory of parts from emacs (or blech! vi) and then place them. Almost like dumping a baggie of the real (...) (22 years ago, 9-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | dragNdrop (Was: Ldglite must be faster)
|
| (...) Let me clarify this. I think I have drag-N-drop from Windows Explorer under control. That uses WM_DROPFILES messages and the protocol is described on the internet. I'll have to see what I can do when someone drags a whole list of part files (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
