Subject:
|
Re: Ldglite must be faster
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 6 Sep 2002 15:26:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1012 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.cad, Don Heyse wrote:
>
> > Hmmm, an LDRAW Graphics Server, that could be nifty. But how about using
> > XML-RPC to talk to it instead of WM_COPYDATA? Then you could control it
> > from any platform, or a browser, or even a telnet session if you like
> > typing raw XML.
>
> How responsive would XML-RPC be? Would it be an appropriate approach
> for an interactive program (as opposed to a program that needs a
> relatively static display)?
Well it sits on top of HTTP, which builds up and then tears down
a TCP connection for each message, so it's not the fastest protocol
in the world. How many messages per second do you think you need
for an interactive program? What are you thinking of sending?
Mouse coordinates, keystrokes, and LDRAW commandline type info, or
whole LDRAW files?
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Ldglite must be faster
|
| (...) Ah. (...) Hmm. Probably not raw keystrokes, but possibly sending messages at keyboard speed. I was basically thinking of anything an editing program might need done for rendering (and interaction) services. XML-RPC would be asynchronous (I (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Ldglite must be faster
|
| (...) How responsive would XML-RPC be? Would it be an appropriate approach for an interactive program (as opposed to a program that needs a relatively static display)? Steve (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
