Subject:
|
Re: Ldglite must be faster
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 6 Sep 2002 13:37:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1067 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Don Heyse wrote:
> Hmmm, an LDRAW Graphics Server, that could be nifty. But how about using
> XML-RPC to talk to it instead of WM_COPYDATA? Then you could control it
> from any platform, or a browser, or even a telnet session if you like
> typing raw XML.
How responsive would XML-RPC be? Would it be an appropriate approach
for an interactive program (as opposed to a program that needs a
relatively static display)?
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Ldglite must be faster
|
| (...) Well it sits on top of HTTP, which builds up and then tears down a TCP connection for each message, so it's not the fastest protocol in the world. How many messages per second do you think you need for an interactive program? What are you (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Ldglite must be faster
|
| (...) Hmmm, an LDRAW Graphics Server, that could be nifty. But how about using XML-RPC to talk to it instead of WM_COPYDATA? Then you could control it from any platform, or a browser, or even a telnet session if you like typing raw XML. Don (22 years ago, 5-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
