To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 8650
8649  |  8651
Subject: 
Re: Ldglite must be faster
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Thu, 5 Sep 2002 17:39:03 GMT
Viewed: 
2165 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Anders Isaksson writes:
> "Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet
> news:s5q9nuc5pr24nbvmrsvitiffojjuu1r2up@4ax.com...
> > In lugnet.cad, Anders Isaksson wrote:
> > 
> > > Another (Windows) wish: I would very much like to see a .dll (with some
> > > standardized interface) implementing LDRAW rendering on a supplied dc - • then
> > > it would be sooo easy to build all those little helper programs, adding
> > > functionality around the basic rendering engine.
> > 
> > Yah, I second this.  I've wanted one of these for years.  Even better
> > (for me) would be an ActiveX custom control.  I *think* one DLL could
> > support both approaches.
> 
> Just fix a DLL and it can be embedded into an ActiveX for anyone who thinks
> he really needs it... (An ActiveX control is just a DLL with a standardized
> (slow) interface).
> 
> Or, for that matter, it could be a separate process (LDRAW Graphics Server),
> which might be easier to port to other systems. Then I can send WM_COPYDATA
> messages to it :-))

Hmmm, an LDRAW Graphics Server, that could be nifty.  But how about using
XML-RPC to talk to it instead of WM_COPYDATA?  Then you could control it
from any platform, or a browser, or even a telnet session if you like
typing raw XML.

Don



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Ldglite must be faster
 
"Don Heyse" <dheyse@hotmail.spam....away.com> skrev i meddelandet news:H1z7p3.8G7@lugnet.com... (...) Nah, the WM_COPYDATA was just a joke :-) I know that's not platform independent. What's XML-RPC? What's wrong with ordinary sockets? Or were you (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad)
  Re: Ldglite must be faster
 
(...) How responsive would XML-RPC be? Would it be an appropriate approach for an interactive program (as opposed to a program that needs a relatively static display)? Steve (24 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Ldglite must be faster
 
"Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet news:s5q9nuc5pr24nbv...4ax.com... (...) then (...) Just fix a DLL and it can be embedded into an ActiveX for anyone who thinks he really needs it... (An ActiveX control is just a DLL with a (...) (24 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad)

39 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR