Subject:
|
Re: Ldglite must be faster
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Sep 2002 21:10:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
943 times
|
| |
|
|
"Don Heyse" <dheyse@hotmail.spam.go.away.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:H1z7p3.8G7@lugnet.com...
>
> Hmmm, an LDRAW Graphics Server, that could be nifty. But how about using
> XML-RPC to talk to it instead of WM_COPYDATA? Then you could control it
> from any platform, or a browser, or even a telnet session if you like
> typing raw XML.
Nah, the WM_COPYDATA was just a joke :-) I know that's not platform
independent.
What's XML-RPC?
What's wrong with ordinary sockets? Or were you thinking 'running the server
over internet'?
--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/proglego.htm
Gallery: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/gallery/index.htm
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Ldglite must be faster
|
| (...) Actually, while it doesn't support WM_COPYDATA, I did just add a function to ldglite (for Windows) to paste text from the clipboard into the LEDIT emulation mode on a CTRL-V. So now it can get part names indirectly from LDList via the (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Ldglite must be faster
|
| (...) Hmmm, an LDRAW Graphics Server, that could be nifty. But how about using XML-RPC to talk to it instead of WM_COPYDATA? Then you could control it from any platform, or a browser, or even a telnet session if you like typing raw XML. Don (22 years ago, 5-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
