To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 51093
    The LEGO Revival Survey —Dan Thompson
   LEGO is a changing company that many think is not what it should be or what it used to be. The best quality construction toys are made by LEGO. The current customer relationship between LEGO and the people who enjoy the toys they make is the best it (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jun-05, to lugnet.general) !! 
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Ed McGlynn
     (...) Repeatability and open ended play. The ability to create and model freeform in addition to the offically published sets is of great value. (...) Quality components, unsurpassed customer service, open communications with customer (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Jonathan Lopes
     (...) It is a great hobby with which I can be creative and challenged. (...) Same as above. (...) they haven't. (...) Pick-a-brick, AFOL acknowledgement and involvement. (...) The S@H bulk program has been a little stagnant. (leading me to Bricklink (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —David Simmons
     (...) Lego is the single best "toy" on the planet, no exceptions. The creative possibilities that lie within even the smallest of sets are limited only by the imagination. These possibilities are always so exciting and inspiring that it's often (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
    
         Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —George Edward Godwin
     (...) OOOOOOOH yeah! Wish I'd said that. Maybe combine the Amusement Park and Zoo into a "Circus" line that could include some rail cars to cross themes and allow for a single theme that would sell to different interests. Sorry, don't mean to hijack (...) (19 years ago, 27-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Øyvind Steinnes
      "Dan Thompson" <danaliobi@aol.com> wrote in message news:IIJrHL.1uCt@lugnet.com... (...) I can use it for amusement, brain gymnastic (try to recreate a technical gadget in LEGO). (...) Long lasting toy, both durability and quality ensures that. And (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Nick Kappatos
     (...) The toy is a system, and regardless of what sets or themes I choose to buy, they are all physically compatible with each other. (...) Unlike action figures, dolls, toy cars, playsets, etc., this toy can be reconfigured into anything one (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Christian Treczoks
     (...) The system of play, they bricks can be used to build nearly everything, resources provided, of course. (...) The Colour Change made it hard to get the resources I need for building my models. (...) Depends on the definition of "recently". If (...) (19 years ago, 27-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Dan Thompson
     Thank you everyone who has answered so far. I hope to get at least 100 responses by August first when I will have it all placed neatly in an excel file to send this info to LEGO. Please ask anyone in your LEGO clubs, LUGs, or any other people you (...) (19 years ago, 27-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
    
         Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Suzanne Rich Green
     (...) Dan, I hope your compilation document will be available to us as well! It should be neat to see. (^^) -Suz (19 years ago, 25-Jul-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
    
         Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Dan Thompson
     (...) I am planning on making it available to everyone. I wish more people would reply though. I planned on making a few pie charts and graphs concerning peoples similar responses and demographics. If there is enough data to do so that is. I will do (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
    
         Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Patrick McFarland
     (...) I'd be great if there was a web form for this. I could pass it around to AFOLs that aren't in any of these communities that are featuring this survey. Also, maybe you should get this survey mentioned on the larger geek news websites, like (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
    
         Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Dan Thompson
     (...) Yes, an automated web form would have been better in some respects but I don't know how to do that and as simple posts people can edit their responses if they want to. I don't want off the cuff answers, I wanted people to think about what they (...) (19 years ago, 27-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Joe Strout
     (...) They're fun; they appeal to the engineer in me. I also enjoy using them to connect with my kids. (...) Every LEGO part is high quality, i.e. well designed and manufactured. (...) It has not. Though I am a little disappointed in the angry faces (...) (19 years ago, 27-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —George Edward Godwin
     Why do LEGO toys have value to you? Because they are fun, durable and "cumulative"(the blocks I got as a kid in 1978 still work with the blocks I got last week.) What makes LEGO brand construction toys worth your money? They always entertaining, (...) (19 years ago, 27-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Jamie Dunn
     (...) I think they are fun and relaxing. I enjoy putting the sets together because it makes me feel more like a kidd. (...) The quality and innovation. (...) I wouldn't say let down, but quality has slipped, set design isn't as original, and there (...) (19 years ago, 28-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Tony Alexander
     (...) Because, regardless of age or gender, it can be enjoyed by all - over and over again. We can, with creativity, build anything we can imagine. My little girl, when she is born in November, is only a short time from playing with LEGO toys (...) (19 years ago, 29-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Thomas D. Fulk, Jr.
     (...) I am a mechanic and have always been fascinated by mechanical items, especially those I can take apart and put back together. I buy technic for the mechanical functions, and other models because I like the way they look when assembled. (...) (...) (19 years ago, 1-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Dan Thompson
     Thank you everyone for helping out with the survey. This is available until August 1st at which point it will be formatted and sent to LEGO. The survey is available on other forums most of which are populated with a younger crowd. Please add some (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)  
    
         Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Dan Thompson
     I know this is posted to many many groups, but I really need people from all interests to help take this survey. There are so many members here at Lugnet yet I feared too few ever check the home page or .general. So, I plea with all of you to allow (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jul-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build, lugnet.castle, lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.pirates, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.sports, lugnet.town, lugnet.trains, lugnet.western)  
    
         Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Dan Thompson
      This is my final plea and I will be silent about this (I will post the results though) from now on. Lugnet isn't filled with little children. There are thousands, I think, of members here who have jobs, families, children, spouses and other things (...) (19 years ago, 28-Jul-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build, lugnet.castle, lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.pirates, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.sports, lugnet.town, lugnet.trains, lugnet.western)
    
         Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Dave Schuler
     (...) With due respect, Dan, I think that an eleven-question essay test is a bit of a turn-off. I speak only for myself, but I've already articulated their likes and dislikes throughout this forum, and I'm reluctant to go through it again. I suspect (...) (19 years ago, 28-Jul-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build)
    
         Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Dan Thompson
     (...) I know. I decided to make this survey for that reason exactly. I myself have complained or praised dozens of new things made by LEGO and the chances of anyone actually caring what I or anyone else thought about just about any topic was almost (...) (19 years ago, 28-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Johannes Koehler
     Hello! Most likely I'll just repeat what others have said before. Howeveer, I didn't read any answer to this thread before I filled in this survey. (...) Because they offer th best possibility to build my own little world. They offer both (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Jonathan Pierce
     (...) They allow for a maximum of creativity and are infinitely combinable across the entire product line. (...) Their longevity, durability, quality of construction and long-term value. (...) Lego has taken to too much of what is called (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Erik L. Knopp
     (...) I have had LEGO toys as long as I can remember. (...) It's LEGO. (...) The ventures into non-building system items. Named minifigs - I liked it better when only the setting, and maybe a basic premise for the story was provided. Who all of the (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —brent skadan
     (...) It is more then a toy -- it is an art form, one that can grow with the individual. (...) Limitless variations with respect to what can be created. (...) N/A (...) I like many of the new colors. And many of the new sets are very nice. (...) An (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Stefan Garcia
     (...) They're endlessly useable and replayable. There are no limits. (...) The above, and they last damn near forever. (...) Galidor, and those ugly new dinos. Also some of the other non-system, and seemingly irrelevant items, such as the bionicle (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Matthew J. Chiles
     As I write this I have not viewed any other responses. (...) They are fun for me, fun for the kids, they are great for building anything you want, they are fun to collect and display. Through Lego toys I meet a lot of interseting people. (...) The (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Suzanne Rich Green
     (...) The elements form a brilliant system which I enjoy working with. (...) The careful engineering that goes into element design continues to adhere to the system specifications while expanding building possibilities. (...) I continue to be (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Andrew Allan
     (...) It's an eternal toy, I have bricks that are 30 - 35 years old and they are still compatable with the modern stuff. Lego creations are only limited by the imagination of the creator and as a result they've crossed galaxys, explored uncharted (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Franklin W. Cain
     (...) 1. I can build anything I can imagine. 2. No matter which "set" the pieces came in, all of them can be used collectively, to enable me to build whatever I want. (Exception: Special decorative pieces, such as Bionicle, I find to be too (...) (19 years ago, 25-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)  
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Patrick McFarland
     (...) I've had LEGO products since I was a little child, and they've shaped my way of thinking. I'm a programmer, and bricks taught me how to think more efficiently about object oriented languages. (...) I like the concept of bricks, I always have. (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Thomas Stangl
     I didn't originally reply to this because I prefer automated surveys, but since you need more input... (...) Bottom line - they're fun. They can be used to create just about anything, and you aren't limited to just what the instruction show. (...) (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Wayne McCaul
     (...) They are the quintessential Schrodinger's cat. A big pile of bricks is *everything* waiting to happen. (...) Lasting interconnectivity. There's are very few parts that can't be connected to every other brick produced. Bricks made 20 years ago (...) (19 years ago, 28-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —David Eaton
     (...) I have to agree with Dave S on this one insofar as it's sort of mundane for many of us to answer these sorts of surveys. I would seriously be amazed if anything appears in this thread that hasn't been voiced before, or has ever gone to Lego (...) (19 years ago, 28-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Bryan Wong
     Wow, David Eaton just pretty much hit the nail on the head... Here's my $0.02: (...) They're fun to play with, and they'll never go "out of style". I can pass them down to my kids in the future. (...) Best quality compared to other building blocks, (...) (19 years ago, 28-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Dusty Neal
     (...) The are a great toy and I believe they have educational value and are just great to let your imagination run wild (...) The fact that no matter what I build if I dont like it I can change it and the fact they are so cool most of the times. (...) (19 years ago, 28-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Niels Karsdorp
     (...) You can create anything you want. It stimulates my creativity. (...) The quality of the bricks, that remain usable over many years. That bricks from the past still connect to the bricks of today. (...) Introducing odd colors available in only (...) (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —James Wilson
     (...) Open-ended play; that is, the ability to create what I want, limited only by imagination and the physical limitations of the bricks. Durability; I have Lego elements in my collection that are at least 30 years old, and they still work as they (...) (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
    
         Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —James Wilson
     Woops, substitute "designer" in my post for "creator" Not enough coffee this morning... (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Donald Alcorn
     1) I like the colors and versitility. 2) Endless hours of creativity and possabilities. 3) FAR Too many single or limited-use elements. Bionicle if full of them. 4) Nice new colors. 5) Brick packs (bulk) in the cool new colors - dk red, dk green, (...) (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Jeff Findley
     (...) Because they are still the best construction toy on the market. (...) The quality is better than the clones. (...) Original space themes have largely been replaced with Star Wars. (...) I like the newer "generic" building sets as well as the (...) (19 years ago, 29-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Mark van 't Hooft
     Here are my thoughts. Mark (...) It's a toy that allows you to be creative and the bricks last forever. It's also a toy for all ages. (...) Play value, durability. (...) Recently, too much juniorization, even my kids are complaining about this. In (...) (19 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Christopher Masi
     (...) They are toys that stimulate creativity and they helped me develop mathematical and spatial skills as a child. The toys are a connection to my past (I am still playing with the bricks I got 28 years ago), yet they still allow me to look (...) (19 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Peter Roberts
     (...) They're fun, interesting and good for creativity. (...) The large amount of good piece/price ratio sets, particularly designer (...) The magazine, it is a load of rubbish full of poor writing and minimal content. There is no 'general interest' (...) (19 years ago, 30-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Bruce Hietbrink
     Ah, what the heck. Here goes: (...) The ability to express myself creatively. Relaxation. (...) The quality of the bricks and piece compatibility across themes. My bricks from 30 years ago still interact with my new bricks today. (...) In many ways (...) (19 years ago, 31-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)  
   
        Re: The LEGO Revival Survey —Gail Meagher
   (...) They are a great way to express my imagination. The elements can be used over and over again for different things. (...) The high quality of the bricks, and the interconnectivity. LEGO pieces from my childhood (mid 70s) work with what I can (...) (19 years ago, 1-Aug-05, to lugnet.general)  
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR