Subject:
|
Re: To ladder or turbolift?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:54:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
445 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.space, Aaron West wrote:
>
> > Perhaps zero gravity chutes to move upward/downward would be a good
> > idea.
>
> After reading Mark's post, I was thinking the same thing. Z-chutes can be
> low-key, yet still visually interesting and have an industrial/spacey look.
>
> Actually, Z-chutes can resemble the interdeck ladders used in Star Trek.
>
> Here's a link to one ladder I built for a z-chute:
> <http://www.geocities.com/partsref/br/brladder.gif>. It just needs a chute
> wrapped around it.
Uh, Steve, that link isn't working for me. Could you double check it?
> The nice thing about z-chutes is, if you build it as a physically complete
> shaft/tube, with hatches opening on each level, you can easily switch to a
> lift/elevator later.
>
> Steve
-Duane
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: To ladder or turbolift?
|
| (...) Odd, it works for me. Not that it's a big deal -- it's just a black wall with several yellow tiles with handles (that's this part (URL)) mounted sideways for rungs. Steve (23 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: To ladder or turbolift?
|
| (...) After reading Mark's post, I was thinking the same thing. Z-chutes can be low-key, yet still visually interesting and have an industrial/spacey look. Actually, Z-chutes can resemble the interdeck ladders used in Star Trek. Here's a link to one (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.space)
|
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
