Subject:
|
Re: To ladder or turbolift?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 23:50:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
478 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Duane Hess writes:
> In lugnet.space, Mark Rideout writes:
<original post cut>
> My first impression is to go with the lift because it's cool. I think that
> you could build the car portion on a 4 x 4 plate (minimum). The 'fig would
> be quite squished, but it would still be cool. The hard part is the control
> and mechanics of the elevator. Most elevators that I have played with are a
> little rough because of minor fluctuations where the bricks meet.
I would agree that it is the coolest way to go, but implementation is the
hardest.
> For more ideas:
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/build/?n=111
Thanks for the pointer on this thread
> > The ship class and purpose isn't totally defined, but current thoughts are
> > towards a scientific/explorer ship.
<cut>
>
> Most of my stuff is single decked, so there isn't much need to go from one
> level to another. When I do need to traverse levels, I usually use a ladder.
> Most of this is just mindless rambling anyway, so take it for what it's worth.
>
> -Duane
Thanks for the pointers though! more than just mindless ramblings!
-Mark
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: To ladder or turbolift?
|
| (...) My first impression is to go with the lift because it's cool. I think that you could build the car portion on a 4 x 4 plate (minimum). The 'fig would be quite squished, but it would still be cool. The hard part is the control and mechanics of (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.space)
|
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
