Subject:
|
Re: SciBrick is looking for you!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.scibrick
|
Date:
|
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:14:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2720 times
|
| |
|
|
Wow ! There is far more bad mojo here than I could ever have guessed : (
To paraphrase Keith, I have hastily jumped in with both feet and I'll
add that I seem to have landed on a claymore ... I've gotten quite a bit
of email recently. Alot of which is fingerpointing from one side or the
other. I really thought Eric was getting the shaft here, but it's clear
that a number of people feel that he's trying to be underhanded. Many
people seem to genuinely want to know Eric's side of the story and some
others are probably setting up spam filters as I type. It's depressing
that otherwise mild-mannered people are refusing to communicate and work
things out. This simply can't be a healthy state of affairs : (
Anyway now that I've butted in, I'm really trying to read between the
lines and grok the situation as best as I can.
Perhaps censorship isn't the right word. I'll conceed that, but I still
think it'd do more harm than good to expunge this thread. It's
certainly brought some things out into the open and I have a feeling
there's more to come.
-JSM
PS. Lenny, I'm not ingoring your last post where you leveled some good
questions at me. I'm trying to organize productive responses...
Keith Goldman wrote:
Much venom deleted !
> -Keith (Rogue SciBricker #2)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: SciBrick is looking for you!
|
| (...) Well, Blockhead, maybe if you had taken 1 minute to search lugnet under his name, you would have found 470 results...compared to 240 for yourself. (...) He's J-a-s-o-n M-a-n-t-o-r, idiot. (...) Probably about the same time that someone said "I (...) (20 years ago, 23-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
