Subject:
|
Re: Track Plan - final version?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.vlc
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:25:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1344 times
|
| |
|
|
Robin Sather wrote in message <39f62912.90712801@lugnet.com>...
> Excellent idea, but in my mind's eye, I see a whole lot more buildings
> and layout than what you've represented in "Building layout.jpg".
> Also, I don't think we have to stick so religiously to the square
> baseplate structure. Perhaps you've intended this, and are only
> showing the general "zoning" of the space. If so, ignore the rest of
> this post ;-).
My feelings on this are mixed. In my own towns I squeeze as much in as
possible by building across baseplate joins and forward into teh sidewalks.
Here though, we're going to have different people building stuff to slot
into a place on the layout, and I'm not sure how you can do that except if
they use a baseplate (or half, or quarter) each. How do you suggest doing
that Robin?
Kevin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Track Plan - final version?
|
| (...) I'm always thinking of the aesthetic before the function, I suppose. I think we should be able to do it the same way we did the rest of the layout, the baseplates especially. Once the layout is finalized with track and baseplates, we have very (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.vlc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Track Plan - final version?
|
| (...) Excellent idea, but in my mind's eye, I see a whole lot more buildings and layout than what you've represented in "Building layout.jpg". Also, I don't think we have to stick so religiously to the square baseplate structure. Perhaps you've (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.vlc)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
