To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 14449
14448  |  14450
Subject: 
Re: Am I the only person who finds Lego CAD systems infuriating?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Thu, 1 Sep 2005 02:38:59 GMT
Viewed: 
665 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Timothy Gould wrote:
I think that by usability you actually mean learnability which is somewhat
different. I agree that most of the Ldraw CAD tools are not that easy to learn.
They do not have dedicated teams to make them so. I think that, at heart, CAD is
a difficult technique to teach people anyway. LDD is most definitely inferior in
its usability as you can do far less with it.

Learnability is one aspect of usability.  If you want to use Jakob Nielsen's
definition:

http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030825.html

The others, such as efficiency, memorability or satisfaction, I cannot comment
on, I couldn't get past the first one.  Error correction I have to say didn't
work very well for me either.

The scope of features doesn't really seem to fit into the usability equation.

I've never seen a piece of FOSS actually have that done.  As a result, the
systems will continue to infuriate casual users like me.

Alas, many of the major tools are not FOSS so it is difficult to add to them. I
have a number of ideas which I think would add to MLCad and make it easier to
learn but they are unlikely to be added quickly.

I misstated that.  Let me try again.  I've never seen a piece of free,
enthusiast (Linux, Open Source, Lego, HAM radio operator) written software that
has had usability analysis done on it.

Even if the code was open for people to add, the FOSS process is not conducive
to allowing for major user interface architectural changes.  Most FOSS projects
are written either by people who have zero understanding of UI, and most source
changes tend to me ports, hacks or bugfixes, not fundamental design changes.

LDD has the greatest chance (out of all the tools) of having that put as a
priority (as it's a commercial, sales oriented tool), though Ted's observations
seem to say differently.

The fact you have some ideas that won't get implemented is a shame.

Calum



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Am I the only person who finds Lego CAD systems infuriating?
 
(...) Addressing each of these points (for MLCad as that's what I'm most used to): Learnability: Low Efficiency: Very high (that's where features comes in) Memorability: Decent Errors: Very low (none really) Satisfaction: Highish However the (...) (19 years ago, 1-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Am I the only person who finds Lego CAD systems infuriating?
 
(...) I think that by usability you actually mean learnability which is somewhat different. I agree that most of the Ldraw CAD tools are not that easy to learn. They do not have dedicated teams to make them so. I think that, at heart, CAD is a (...) (19 years ago, 31-Aug-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

61 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR