Subject:
|
Re: Am I the only person who finds Lego CAD systems infuriating?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Sep 2005 02:38:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
665 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Timothy Gould wrote:
> I think that by usability you actually mean learnability which is somewhat
> different. I agree that most of the Ldraw CAD tools are not that easy to learn.
> They do not have dedicated teams to make them so. I think that, at heart, CAD is
> a difficult technique to teach people anyway. LDD is most definitely inferior in
> its usability as you can do far less with it.
Learnability is one aspect of usability. If you want to use Jakob Nielsen's
definition:
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030825.html
The others, such as efficiency, memorability or satisfaction, I cannot comment
on, I couldn't get past the first one. Error correction I have to say didn't
work very well for me either.
The scope of features doesn't really seem to fit into the usability equation.
> > I've never seen a piece of FOSS actually have that done. As a result, the
> > systems will continue to infuriate casual users like me.
> Alas, many of the major tools are not FOSS so it is difficult to add to them. I
> have a number of ideas which I think would add to MLCad and make it easier to
> learn but they are unlikely to be added quickly.
I misstated that. Let me try again. I've never seen a piece of free,
enthusiast (Linux, Open Source, Lego, HAM radio operator) written software that
has had usability analysis done on it.
Even if the code was open for people to add, the FOSS process is not conducive
to allowing for major user interface architectural changes. Most FOSS projects
are written either by people who have zero understanding of UI, and most source
changes tend to me ports, hacks or bugfixes, not fundamental design changes.
LDD has the greatest chance (out of all the tools) of having that put as a
priority (as it's a commercial, sales oriented tool), though Ted's observations
seem to say differently.
The fact you have some ideas that won't get implemented is a shame.
Calum
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|