| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
| |
And, (if it were me) I’d just take about 10 readings and average them. I
would expect “empty” readings to be all over the place, and “black” or “red”
to be pretty constant.
|
I concur with this completely. I think my final scan scheme will be something
like take 32 readings, sort into high 16 and low 16 and get an average for each
group and compare the difference in the high/low average... maybe discard the
top and bottom two as well. Something to eliminate as many anomolies as
possible.
I found that because I’m not using a rotation sensor on my horizontal axis, I
have trouble getting the sensor pointed exactly at the cel and sometimes I end
up with artificially ‘bright’ numbers because I’m picking up a bit of the frame.
If I had some Lego lights I think I’d just put the sensor in passive mode and
stick my own light sources on there... :) Of course, I don’t have a free motor
port and it would be poor form to run them off a battery box.
Mike
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: scan time....
|
| (...) WTF??? poor form? who said this?? HUH!!!! its perfectly acceptable to run constant powered device from a batter box. DUH! Chris "It is a very clever strategy IMHO, and I applaud Chris for thinking of it." K.C. (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: scan time....
|
| (...) hmm. I was thinking it could push a cruse ship, which is the size of the empire state building... (...) My mom and my wife both bought me LEGO sets for X-mas. But there was nothing as fun as a Bionicle set. (...) I doubt it can hurt your (...) (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
34 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
