To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25512
25511  |  25513
Subject: 
Kyoto
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:33:55 GMT
Viewed: 
1503 times
  
   The problem with Kyoto is that it imposes crippling economic setbacks to the US while offering minimal benefit. I wouldn’t support it either, not because I’m arrogant and think that the US should be allowed to pollute as much as it wants - but instead because it’s a raw deal with no measurable benefit.


The “world against the USA” paranoia aside, your argument does have some merit. That said, your post brings two points to mind:
  1. Bush should have renegotiated the treaty instead of ripping it up.
  2. How do you think we should protect the environment?

   Capitalism seems ultimately to have been one of the best weapons against communism.

I think you mean the former USSR. There is a strong argument which says that the cold war was exacerbated by the need to keep the US’s wartime workers feeding the capitalist machine. Search google for “McCarthyism”, “Bernays”, “capitalism” and suchlike. The US may have been ruled by fear even back then!

Scott A



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: What's actually the task of the moderators on BrickShelf?
 
"Johannes 'Jojo' Koehler" <chutspe@gmx.net> wrote in message news:I2t532.230G@lugnet.com... (...) I think people do things for different reasons, and rather than judge people based on our own worst fears and worries, we should try to find the truth (...) (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

44 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR