Subject:
|
Re: What's actually the task of the moderators on BrickShelf?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 23:39:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3754 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton wrote:
>
> > I'm not a moderator or anything, but I think the intention was really to prevent
> > people from posting non-Lego things, and not really offensive things. So if
> > someone wants to post Lego porn or Lego violence, that's potentially acceptable
> > (if I understand the moderation correctly), but posting a picture of an actual
> > family picnic is NOT acceptable (because it's not Lego related).
>
> What about images with clone brand bricks? I ask for two reasons, the second of
> which is that these faux-Reich models include a considerable number of MEGABLOKS
> elements. If clones are verboten, then the pictures could be bounced for that
> reason regardless of the "offensivenss" of the subject matter.
>
> I've emailed Brickshelf about this, but I thought I'd post in advance of the
> answer, just to see what the ambient sentiments might be.
AFAIK, clones are OK on Brickshelf. It would be useful if Kevin posted a rough
indication of the guidelines he uses though.
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
44 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
