Subject:
|
Re: What's actually the task of the moderators on BrickShelf?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 20:29:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1121 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton wrote:
> I'm not a moderator or anything, but I think the intention was really to prevent
> people from posting non-Lego things, and not really offensive things. So if
> someone wants to post Lego porn or Lego violence, that's potentially acceptable
> (if I understand the moderation correctly), but posting a picture of an actual
> family picnic is NOT acceptable (because it's not Lego related).
What about images with clone brand bricks? I ask for two reasons, the second of
which is that these faux-Reich models include a considerable number of MEGABLOKS
elements. If clones are verboten, then the pictures could be bounced for that
reason regardless of the "offensivenss" of the subject matter.
I've emailed Brickshelf about this, but I thought I'd post in advance of the
answer, just to see what the ambient sentiments might be.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
44 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
