Subject:
|
Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:13:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1942 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
No. He showed that he thought he could dictate the ToS.
|
Is there even the slightest shred of evidence for this statement?
|
Yes, his own words:
“Dan informed me yesterday that I needed to remove that wording as it’s a
ToS violation. I responded with a suggestion for a different approach.”
Later: “...I responded rather tersely, suggesting that the implementation be
fixed instead. In hindsight I should have either immediately removed the text
or composed an explanation, but I was tired...”
i.e. rather than bring his listings within the ToS, he suggested the ToS be
altered. You(?) or I would have done as Dan had requested, then sought to
contest the matter if it was significant enough.
|
I’m not sure from your writing if you simply don’t know what dictate means or if
there is some less transparent explanation for your mischaracterization of the
events that you accurately quoted. Maybe you can shed some light on this?
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
|
| (...) Yes, his own words: "Dan informed me yesterday that I needed to remove that wording as it's a ToS violation. I responded with a suggestion for a different approach." Later: "...I responded rather tersely, suggesting that the implementation be (...) (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
