To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25509
25508  |  25510
Subject: 
Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:31:28 GMT
Viewed: 
1855 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:

   No. He showed that he thought he could dictate the ToS.

Is there even the slightest shred of evidence for this statement?

Yes, his own words: “Dan informed me yesterday that I needed to remove that wording as it’s a ToS violation. I responded with a suggestion for a different approach.

Later: “...I responded rather tersely, suggesting that the implementation be fixed instead. In hindsight I should have either immediately removed the text or composed an explanation, but I was tired...

i.e. rather than bring his listings within the ToS, he suggested the ToS be altered. You(?) or I would have done as Dan had requested, then sought to contest the matter if it was significant enough.


  
   It is notable that Larry’s posts on this issue lack contrition.

Are you suggesting that he should pretend contrition even though he did nothing wrong?

Chris

Are you suggesting he did “nothing wrong”? ;)

Scott A

PS Reading his post again, I have to concede that it did not show a complete lack of contrition. Sorry Larry!!



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
 
(...) I'm not sure from your writing if you simply don't know what dictate means or if there is some less transparent explanation for your mischaracterization of the events that you accurately quoted. Maybe you can shed some light on this? Chris (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
 
(...) To be fair, his response was "How about you implement bulk correctly instead? Seems a better solution to me." (according to Dan). That doesn't suggest that ToS be altered, rather that (as Lar saw it) a feature be (re-)implemented correctly. (...) (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
 
(...) Is there even the slightest shred of evidence for this statement? (...) Are you suggesting that he should pretend contrition even though he did nothing wrong? Chris (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR