Subject:
|
Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:00:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1743 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
No. He showed that he thought he could dictate the ToS.
|
Is there even the slightest shred of evidence for this statement?
| |
It is notable that Larry’s posts on this issue lack contrition.
|
Are you suggesting that he should pretend contrition even though he did nothing
wrong?
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
|
| (...) Yes, his own words: "Dan informed me yesterday that I needed to remove that wording as it's a ToS violation. I responded with a suggestion for a different approach." Later: "...I responded rather tersely, suggesting that the implementation be (...) (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
|
| (...) down while (...) BL buyer (...) entirely (...) mistakes (...) to protect (...) his TOS (...) it, it (...) enough (...) No. He showed that he thought he could dictate the ToS. I want to be protected from that sort of mind-set. (...) ebay would (...) (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
