Subject:
|
Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:48:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1683 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
No. He showed that he thought he could dictate the ToS.
|
Is there even the slightest shred of evidence for this statement?
|
Yes, his own words:
“Dan informed me yesterday that I needed to remove that wording as it’s a
ToS violation. I responded with a suggestion for a different approach.”
Later: “...I responded rather tersely, suggesting that the implementation
be fixed instead. In hindsight I should have either immediately removed the
text or composed an explanation, but I was tired...”
i.e. rather than bring his listings within the ToS, he suggested the ToS be
altered. You(?) or I would have done as Dan had requested, then sought to
contest the matter if it was significant enough.
|
I’m not sure from your writing if you simply don’t know what dictate means or
if there is some less transparent explanation for your mischaracterization of
the events that you accurately quoted. Maybe you can shed some light on
this?
|
Chris, if I’m so wrong, maybe you could tell me what you think.
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
|
| (...) I'm not sure from your writing if you simply don't know what dictate means or if there is some less transparent explanation for your mischaracterization of the events that you accurately quoted. Maybe you can shed some light on this? Chris (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
