To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25522
25521  |  25523
Subject: 
Re: suspended Bricklink shops
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:54:59 GMT
Viewed: 
1658 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:

   To be fair, his response was “How about you implement bulk correctly instead? Seems a better solution to me.” (according to Dan).

I confirm that was the exact wording.

Too terse? Yes. Refusing to abide by the ToS? No.

Do you feel that your intial listing was outside of the ToS? If not, why change it?

I find it notable that neither you or Dan have posted your full e-mail exchange. I know from personal experience and the testimonials of others that you indulge sending abusive e-mails; is that what lies behind this?

   Asking that it be altered? No.

Trying to get cute? Yes. ;)

Scott A



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: suspended Bricklink shops
 
(...) I confirm that was the exact wording. Too terse? Yes. Refusing to abide by the ToS? No. Asking that it be altered? No. (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR