Subject:
|
Re: suspended Bricklink shops
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:29:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1911 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
> To be fair, his response was "How about you implement bulk correctly instead?
> Seems a better solution to me." (according to Dan).
I confirm that was the exact wording.
Too terse? Yes.
Refusing to abide by the ToS? No.
Asking that it be altered? No.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops
|
| (...) Do you feel that your intial listing was outside of the ToS? If not, why change it? I find it notable that neither you or Dan have posted your full e-mail exchange. I know from personal experience and the testimonials of others that you (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
|
| (...) To be fair, his response was "How about you implement bulk correctly instead? Seems a better solution to me." (according to Dan). That doesn't suggest that ToS be altered, rather that (as Lar saw it) a feature be (re-)implemented correctly. (...) (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
