To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23007
23006  |  23008
Subject: 
Re: Justice for all.....
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:21:18 GMT
Viewed: 
934 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote:
The international criminal court;

Bush refuses to sign up to it as your
countrymen *could* end up in jail *if* they commit war crimes. Frankly,
I feel war criminals belong in jail!

See:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3035296.stm

"The United States has suspended over $47m in military aid to 35 countries
that have not signed deals to [grant American soldiers immunity from
prosecution for war crimes...] ...The US does not recognise the ICC, saying
its forces could be subjected to politically-motivated prosecution."

Did he actually say that's why he didn't sign it.  My opinion is that
the ICC is a good idea whose time has not yet come.  Perhaps when more
of the world is run by elected governments that can be held accountable
for their actions, we'll be ready for some sort of world court system.
Have patience.

Thanks for the link.  It highlights yet another reason the world
is not yet ready for a global court system.  Money.  Until the
economic disparity in the world is reduced significantly, there is
too great a possiblilty that economically disadvantaged countries
can be bribed.  Even more patience is required for that one, I think.

However, now that the EU has a single currency, perhaps they could start
a bit smaller with an EUCC, show everyone how well it works, and slowly
try to entice other nations to join.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Justice for all.....
 
(...) That hasn't bothered rich countries from joining in thus far. Richer than the US, per capita, I might add. So whose money, bribing whom, to what end? If it were for money alone, the ICC would be swamped in trials already. (...) The EU has had (...) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Justice for all.....
 
(...) See: (URL) United States has suspended over $47m in military aid to 35 countries that have not signed deals to grant American soldiers immunity from prosecution for war crimes... ...The US does not recognise the ICC, saying its forces could be (...) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

52 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR