To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 22992
22991  |  22993
Subject: 
Re: Justice for all.....
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:10:52 GMT
Viewed: 
730 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:

You really are grasping a staws; from their
<http://web.amnesty.org/pages/irq-faq_2-eng site>:

Heh, beat you to it.  http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=22983

Your point is facile. Even if nobody did condemn the way US troops were
treated (they did), that does not give your ‘president’ the right to break
the law by parading his trophies [both dead and alive] on TV.

I'm not sure I made a point, other than that google is not the best
way to search for old news.  I did find it before you did though, or
did you *purposely* leave out the other side of the story?

Scott never does that. :-) Neither do any of the rest of us here. ;-)

I'm new
here, so I don't know all the rules of .debate.

Rule #1 if you see a big nesting, deeper than 3 or 4, and it's you and Scott(1),
and you're not getting anywhere with your point, give up.

What do you think the punishment for reciprocal video humiliation
should be?

Put Bush in front of the ICC? ;)

Wouldn't someone first have to prove Bush himself gave the order to
broadcast videos?  I'm sure the guilty party will turn out to be someone
from the liberal media.  ;^)

By the way, what's the ICC?

International Criminal Court? I'm guessing it's not the Interstate Commerce
Commission (since that was abolished)

1 - actually, you and "whoever", I'd say. We all have our hobby horses here, and
we all like to ride them here.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Justice for all.....
 
(...) Heh, beat you to it. (URL) Your point is facile. Even if nobody did condemn the way US troops were (...) I'm not sure I made a point, other than that google is not the best way to search for old news. I did find it before you did though, or (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

52 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR